Posts tagged android

Things I’ve learned as an Android user.

You can talk about freedom, or openness all you want, but it doesn’t really matter.

Innovation for the user isn’t happening on Android devices.

Moving from iOS to Android was an experiment to teach me something about other interfaces, to make me more well rounded as a strategist, and to challenge some of my assumptions about the ‘right’ or in some cases ‘only’ way of doing things.

All of that has happened.

But the primary feeling of owning an Android device is the feeling of being 6 months behind.

I bought a top of the line Galaxy SII in August. I’ve been using it as my primary phone since then, so for about 5 months total. In that time frame, I’ve waited for updates (none of which have ever come), waited for new and old apps to be ported to the platform (I’m still living sans-Instagram and Pinterest), and putting up with features of great apps that don’t work (I can’t record video on Path, or edit posts on Tumblr).

This isn’t really a complaint about Android. It’s a complaint about systems that are fragmented, both by OS and by hardware. And it’s a hint of ‘broken window’ theory, as well - if Google doesn’t care about this platform working well, why should developers.

I can completely understand the appeal of control, that Android devices promise. I was thrilled by it, for the first month or so I owned the phone. But that thrill of control fades, when you realize it can just as accurately be called management or maintenance, and it’s far from optional.

Assuming standard use, with minimal ‘management’ or ‘maintenance’, my experience on Android has been one of terrible battery life, intermittent crashing, software conflicts, and frustrating hardware issues (such as the infuriatingly loud buzzing noise the phone makes when vibrating, akin to a subwoofer rattling in a trunk). 

At this point, people will point out that 1) I’m not running Ice Cream Sandwich, 2) I should get a Nexus branded phone, rather than something running Samsung’s TouchWiz UI, and 3) I should root the phone, and just run Cyanogen, or something similar.

1) I can’t run ICS, Samsung hasn’t updated the phone.
2) That’s not an argument, it’s a suggestion that Android is a failed experiment, and that ‘open’ means failure unless you leave it unedited.
3) I don’t WANT to root my phone. I shouldn’t have to. If I need to make an unstable phone LESS STABLE to make it usable, it is a poorly designed and manufactured phone.

I’m not writing this as an Apple fanboy. I’m not writing this as someone who has no idea what he’s talking about, and hasn’t devoted time to trying to understand this platform.

I’m a reasonably experienced user, of a recent flagship device, of the most successful manufacturer of Android smartphones.

And I’m telling you, it’s not good enough.

There’s a reason a single manufacturer, with a line that has never exceeded the 3 phones it currently sells, makes the majority of profits in the smartphone industry (as of Q3 2011 numbers). \

It’s because, at core, they don’t really have any competition.

Interface Bilinguality

I’ve been using an iPhone nearly exclusively for 3 years, first a 3G, then an iPhone 4. I own an iPad, and a MacBook for my home computing.

After losing my iPhone and needing to replace it, I realized I was becoming interface monolingual, and it was probably hurting my thinking.

One of my biggest regrets is that I don’t speak anything other than english - I’m convinced this limits my ability to think outside of my ‘cultural box’.

I think that, as much as I love Apple products, doing all of my personal, and much of my professional, computing in OSX and derivatives, has disconnected me from a realm of possibility.

I use a windows machine at work, and have for the 4.5+ years I’ve been a Mac owner, so I still have some idea as to the desktop reality of non-Mac users.

But only owning Apple smartphones is a dangerous thing for someone who needs to think in terms of different user experiences and expectations. I might like the simplicity and user interface of iOS, but that doesn’t mean I can get away with being ignorant to the behaviours and options open to an Android user.

So, I replaced my lost iPhone with a samsung galaxy s2. It’s a great phone, totally different, and yet very similar (at least, similar enough to incite a lawsuit for copying apple’s industrial design). And I’m enjoying the feeling of learning a new user experience ‘language’, and seeing what assumptions and metaphors I’ve been ignoring completely, because I didn’t have the gestural or behavioural breadth to really understand that there were optional at all.

The underlying suggestion, of course, is that people working with technology and communication should intentionally avoid letting a set preference, or a belief in what is ‘best’ limit them from being fluent in different OSes, different hardware configurations, and different software choices.

You never appreciate the decisions that have been made, or not made, until you can see what happens when you head down other paths.

I am encouraging every company we work with to invest as heavily in Android as they invest in iPhone/iPad. I actually think they should invest more because Android is still wide open and the iPhone/iPad marketplaces are leaderboard driven and the leaders have been established and it’s hard to crack into the top ten anywhere.

Fred Wilson: A VC. 

(If Fred’s saying this, look for some cool things coming to Android.)

This is extremely important.

(via evangotlib)

Is it just me, or is this basically saying that iOS has a developed marketplace, and Android doesn’t?  I’m having trouble thinking of a situation where there’s an established market for a product or service, and there aren’t clear leaders that need to be toppled - the question is, what takes more work: creating something that shifts an established marketplace, or creating something that is so compelling it builds it’s own marketplace?  This is complicated by the fact that you can deliver nearly identical product features on both of these platforms, so the difference in product innovation can’t be earth-shattering.